Publicación: La voz y la palabra : ¿un problema lingüístico en Aristóteles? : excursus sobre la posición de J. Araos San Martín
Fecha
2019-07-01
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Católica de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades
Resumen
La existencia del lenguaje es evidentísima, aunque captar su naturaleza es un asunto espinoso por el que se han dispuesto ingentes esfuerzos. Los resultados no han sido siempre unánimes, ya que la concepción del lenguaje emerge, con toda lógica, muy ligada a la visión metafísica y gnoseología que uno profese. En esta investigación, prevemos comprender la concepción del lenguaje en Aristóteles. Cómo es, en concreto, la consideración aristotélica de la esencia de la palabra será la interrogación más sintética que guie los primeros operativos, puesto que es la menor formulación a la que podemos reducir la cuestión. Jaime Araos San Martín, filósofo español vinculado a la Universidad de Navarra, dedicó una obra al tema: La filosofía aristotélica del lenguaje. Con él, precisamente, dialogaremos y disentiremos. Nos apoyaremos en sus logros investigativos y nos distanciaremos de algunos errores, a fin de optimizar resultados. Como él mismo sugiere, un buen inicio es ahondar en la comparación y diferenciación entre la voz y la palabra en el Estagirita. De esta manera, Araos San Martín nos guiará haciéndose nuestra referencia y nos mostrará cuál es, en su opinión, la esencia aristotélica de la palabra.
The existence of language is more than evident, even though catching its nature is a thorny issue for which great efforts have been made. The results have not always been unanimous, since the conception of language emerges, with all logics, closely related to the metaphysical vision and gnoseology that each one observes. In this research we expect to comprehend the conception of language in Aristotle. How, in concrete, the Aristotelian consideration of the essence of the word is, will be the most synthetic question which will guide the first schemes, as it is the smallest formulation to which we can reduce the question. Jaime Araos San Martin, Spanish philosopher related to the University of Navarra, wrote a work related to the topic: "The Aristotelian Philosophy of language". With him, precisely, we will discuss and disagree. We will rely on his investigative achievements and we will keep distance from some errors, in order to optimize results. As he himself suggests, a good start lies in deepening comparison and differentiation between voice and word in the Stagirite. This way, Araos San Martin will guide us by becoming our reference and will show us which is, in his opinion, the Aristotelian essence of the word.
The existence of language is more than evident, even though catching its nature is a thorny issue for which great efforts have been made. The results have not always been unanimous, since the conception of language emerges, with all logics, closely related to the metaphysical vision and gnoseology that each one observes. In this research we expect to comprehend the conception of language in Aristotle. How, in concrete, the Aristotelian consideration of the essence of the word is, will be the most synthetic question which will guide the first schemes, as it is the smallest formulation to which we can reduce the question. Jaime Araos San Martin, Spanish philosopher related to the University of Navarra, wrote a work related to the topic: "The Aristotelian Philosophy of language". With him, precisely, we will discuss and disagree. We will rely on his investigative achievements and we will keep distance from some errors, in order to optimize results. As he himself suggests, a good start lies in deepening comparison and differentiation between voice and word in the Stagirite. This way, Araos San Martin will guide us by becoming our reference and will show us which is, in his opinion, the Aristotelian essence of the word.
Descripción
Palabras clave
VOZ, PALABRA, LENGUAJE HUMANO, ESENCIA FÍSICA, ESENCIA SIMBÓLICA, SIGNIFICACIÓN
