Publicación: ¿Son sistemas el individualismo y el holismo?
Fecha
2018-11-05
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Católica de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades
Resumen
Tanto el individualismo como el holismo son sistemas; a uno y a otro les corresponde un sistema cuyo objeto y cuyo método son inherentes a ellos. Hay un individualismo lógico cuyas totalidades no totales son abstractas y un individualismo lógico cuyas totalidades no totales son concretas. El sistema es individualista u holístico por el objeto. Mientras que el sistema del individualismo ontológico es definible como teorético-conceptual-individualista-ontológico-teleológico, el del individualismo lógico lo es como teorético-conceptual-individualista-lógico. La proposición de que “el individualismo equivale al holismo y viceversa” es falsa, en tanto que es verdadera la que afirma que “el holismo es contrario al individualismo y viceversa”. El objeto del sistema puede ser holístico-individualista, pero no puede definirse como objeto concreto-abstracto derivado de una totalidad concreta abstracta que lo definiría como diverso del concreto y del abstracto, considerados separadamente.
Both individualism and holism are systems; to one and the other there corresponds a system whose object and method are inherent to them. There is a logical individualism whose not total totalities are abstract and a logic individualism whose not total totalities are concrete.The system is individualistic or holistic due to the object. While the system of ontological individualism is definable as theoretical-concrete-individualist-ontological-teleological, that of the logical individualism is individualistic-theoretical-conceptual-logical. The proposition that says that “individualism is equivalent to holism and vice versa” is false, while it is true the one affirming that “holism is contrary to individualism and vice versa”. The object of the system can be holistic-individualistic, but cannot be defined as a concrete-abstract object derived from an abstract concrete totality that should define it as different from the concrete and concept u alones, considered separately.
Both individualism and holism are systems; to one and the other there corresponds a system whose object and method are inherent to them. There is a logical individualism whose not total totalities are abstract and a logic individualism whose not total totalities are concrete.The system is individualistic or holistic due to the object. While the system of ontological individualism is definable as theoretical-concrete-individualist-ontological-teleological, that of the logical individualism is individualistic-theoretical-conceptual-logical. The proposition that says that “individualism is equivalent to holism and vice versa” is false, while it is true the one affirming that “holism is contrary to individualism and vice versa”. The object of the system can be holistic-individualistic, but cannot be defined as a concrete-abstract object derived from an abstract concrete totality that should define it as different from the concrete and concept u alones, considered separately.
Descripción
Palabras clave
INDIVIDUALISMO LÓGICO, INDIVIDUALISMO ONTOLÓGICO, INDIVIDUALISMO HOLÍSTICO, LOGIC INDIVIDUALISM, ONTOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALISM, HOLISTIC INDIVIDUALISM
