Publicación: Apreciaciones en torno a un fallo sobre la configuración del delito de abuso sexual ; ¿se puede abusar sexualmente de alguien sin tocarlo y estando a una gran distancia?
Archivos
Fecha
2022-07-15
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Católica de La Plata. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas
Resumen
En primer lugar, se utiliza como disparador un fallo del Tribunal Superior de Córdoba, que convalida y aplica la calificación de abuso sexual a hechos cometidos a distancia y sin tocar, ni tener inmediación con la víctima. Vamos a analizar los argumentos del Tribunal y los de la defensa, que sostiene que no se puede abusar a alguien sin tocarlo, y trataremos de desenmascarar las razones que sostienen una falacia dogmática. Esto ya tenía respuesta en un autor nacional hace más de cuarenta años y, pese a sus sólidos argumentos, se encontraba solapada y desautorizada por una interpretación doctrinaria contemporánea, que, en forma paradojal, no se adapta a los tiempos actuales y va de contramano con la normativa nacional e internacional de protección de violencia contra la mujer; ello le resta valor a una situación socialmente perjudicial, pero, por sobre todas las cosas, parece desconocer o negar el texto de la ley vigente.
In the first place we use as a trigger a ruling of the Superior Court of Córdoba, which validates and applies the qualification of sexual abuse to acts committed at a distance and without touching, or having immediacy with the victim. We will analyze the arguments of the Court and those of the defense, which maintains that someone cannot be abused without touching them and, we will try o unmask the reasons that support a dogmatic fallacy. This had an answer in a national author more than 40 years ago and, despite its solid arguments, it was overlapped and disauthorized by a contemporary doctrinal interpretation, which paradoxically does not adapt to current times and goes against national and international regulations for the protection of violence against women, detracting from a socially harmful situation, but which above all seems to ignore or deny the text of the current law.
In the first place we use as a trigger a ruling of the Superior Court of Córdoba, which validates and applies the qualification of sexual abuse to acts committed at a distance and without touching, or having immediacy with the victim. We will analyze the arguments of the Court and those of the defense, which maintains that someone cannot be abused without touching them and, we will try o unmask the reasons that support a dogmatic fallacy. This had an answer in a national author more than 40 years ago and, despite its solid arguments, it was overlapped and disauthorized by a contemporary doctrinal interpretation, which paradoxically does not adapt to current times and goes against national and international regulations for the protection of violence against women, detracting from a socially harmful situation, but which above all seems to ignore or deny the text of the current law.
Descripción
Palabras clave
ABUSO SEXUAL, DELITOS PROPIA MANO, PRODUCCIÓN DE IMÁGENES CON CONTENIDO SEXUAL, VIOLENCIA DE GÉNERO, VIOLENCIA DIGITAL, SEXUAL ABUSE, CRIMES OF ONE´S OWN HAND, PRODUCTION OF IMAGES WITH SEXUAL CONTENT, GENDER VIOLENCE, DIGITAL VIOLENCE
